Regulation & Licensing
- Home
- Regulation & Licensing
- OPAL Reactor
- OPAL Reactor Construction Licence
- Introduction
- About Regulatory and Policy Branch
- Information For Licence Applicants
- Information For Licence Holders
- Regulatory Guides
- Regulatory Forms
- Codes & Standards
- Security of Radiological Material
- Commitment to Good Regulatory Practice
- Regulatory Forums
- Import and Export Permit Applications
- Research Reactors
- National Uniformity
- International Collaborations
- Our Relationship with State and Territory Regulators
Bulletin
Read about the latest regulatory and policy news from ARPANSA
quick links
contact
For more information please get in touch with Regulatory and Policy Branch
- +61 2 9541 8330
- +61 2 9541 8348
- email ARPANSA
OPAL Reactor Construction Licence
An application to construct the proposed replacement research reactor was received by the CEO in May 2001. In support of this application, ANSTO submitted a Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) which provided much of the detail for the safety design.
Application for Construction
- Covering Letter of 18 May 2001, together with Facility Licence Application Form (PDF 328kb)
- Application for a Facility Licence, Construction Authorisation (PDF 1,317kb)
International Peer Review of Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR)
One of the recommendations of the Environment Australia Environmental Assessment Report for the proposed replacement research reactor at Lucas Heights was that the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR), to be prepared at the detailed design stage, must be subject to independent peer review to the satisfaction of ARPANSA.
To facilitate this, ARPANSA assembled a team of international experts. The team comprised of individuals from Europe, America, and Africa. The review commenced in late May 2001 and concluded in mid July 2001. The final report from the International Peer Review Team has been presented to the CEO of ARPANSA and is now available to members of the public. In producing the final report, the International Peer Review Team raised a number of questions relating to the PSAR. ANSTO has since responded to these questions.
ANSTO Responses to Questions raised by the International Peer Review Team (PDF 140kb)
Nuclear Safety Committee Report
As part of the review process, the CEO of ARPANSA requested the Nuclear Safety Committee to advise him on a number of issues relating to the construction application. Consequently, they published the following report in February 2002
ANSTO's Responses to Questions Raised by ARPANSA During the Reactive Review Process
The following table contains links to documents, in pdf format, which display replies from ANSTO to questions raised by ARPANSA during the Reactive Review Process. Questions were sent to ANSTO in batches on 9 July, 18 July, and on 9 August. The number of questions raised on each chapter of the PSAR from each group is highlighted in the table below. The table is updated regularly as ARPANSA receives responses from ANSTO. Further information is available in the ARPANSA media release dated August 20 2001.
|
Section |
Number of Comments, Issues or Questions |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 July | 18 July | 9 August | |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Preliminary Safety Analysis Report Chapter: |
|||
|
45 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
101 |
0 |
0 | |
|
0 |
4 |
0 | |
|
04 Buildings & Structures |
0 |
78 |
0 |
|
05 The Reactor |
0 |
60 |
116 |
|
0 |
0 |
56 | |
|
07 Engineered Safety Features |
0 |
0 |
32 |
|
85 |
0 |
0 | |
|
18 |
0 |
0 | |
|
10 Auxiliary Systems(PDF 147kb) |
0 |
90 |
65 |
|
0 |
0 |
65 | |
|
12 Operational Radiological Safety |
41 |
0 |
14 |
|
0 |
13 |
0 | |
|
0 |
10 |
0 | |
|
13 |
0 |
0 | |
|
16 Safety Analysis |
0 |
42 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
6 | |
|
0 |
25 |
0 | |
|
0 |
26 |
0 | |
|
8 |
0 |
0 | |
- PSAR Appendix A - PSA (PDF 408kb) - Responses to questions raised on 22 August 2001
- ANSTO's responses to questions raised on Spent Fuel (PDF 26kb)
- Note: Although this document does not represent a particular chapter of the PSAR, it contains questions and responses which are relevant to the review process.
- ANSTO Responses to Questions raised by the International Peer Review Team (PDF 140kb)
Regulatory Assessment Report (RAR)
As part of the review process, ARPANSA staff performed an assessment of the information provided by ANSTO in their application. This assessment was summarised in the form of a Regulatory Assessment Report (RAR). Note that all of the following parts need to be collated to form the entire document.
- Regulatory Assessment Report - Title pages (PDF 74kb)
- Regulatory Assessment Report - Sections 1 and 2 (PDF 1,168kb)
- Regulatory Assessment Report - Sections 3 (PDF 1,215kb)
- Regulatory Assessment Report - Section 4 (PDF 202kb)
Issue of Licence
Talking into account all of the above information, as well as public submissions, international best practice, and other information required under the legislation, the CEO issued a licence to ANSTO to construct the RRR in April 2002.
- Construction Licence issued to ANSTO (PDF 1,394kb)
- Comments by the CEO on the reasons for issuing of the construction licence (PDF 483kb)
The image of the HIFAR reactor was provided by ANSTO.
Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to view PDF files
The free Adobe Acrobat Reader is available from Adobe's website