Code for Radiation Protection in Medical Exposure (RPS C-5)
ARPANSA is engaging in public consultation on the draft Code for Radiation Protection in Medical Exposure (Radiation Protection Series C-5).
23 Feb 2018 - 09:00
25 May 2018 - 17:00
The following formal submissions have been made public.
AnonymousSubmitted: Friday, March 9, 2018 - 10:03
AnonymousSubmitted: Friday, May 18, 2018 - 08:23
AnonymousSubmitted: Friday, May 25, 2018 - 15:57
3.1.1(b) needs modification to "justified by...the referrer" Dental specialists and dentists also refer for 2D & 3D radiology.
3.1.4(d) & (e) has cost implications.
Clarify/define the term "administration" (3.1.23)
3.2.6 is unneccessary.
3.2.9 requires clarification - which standards?
3.2.10(b) are there "acceptable" norms?
3.2.14 is too vague
AnonymousSubmitted: Friday, May 25, 2018 - 16:55
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please see attachment.
Australian Medical AssociationSubmitted: Thursday, April 12, 2018 - 17:47
The AMA's submission is detailed in an uploaded document.
Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation TherapySubmitted: Friday, May 25, 2018 - 15:31
David ThieleSubmitted: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 - 16:55
Sections 3.1.14, 3.3.4 appear to say similar things and perhaps should be consolidated.
Glenn GillettSubmitted: Thursday, May 24, 2018 - 19:44
Please see my comments in the attached document.
Joshua DanielSubmitted: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - 17:01
Australia has individual licences for every state making it extremely difficult for National Techs working all around country to monitor different expiry dates for each state and pay individual fees that are not cheap. Please formulate a National Radiation Licence for all of Australia.