Radiation literature survey

Authored By:

This case-control study investigated the association between mobile phone use and brain tumours in adults. The study compared mobile phone use between 447 cases of brain tumour (253 glioma and 194 meningioma) that were diagnosed between 2004-2006 and 892 matched controls. There was no statistically significant association between regular phone use and brain tumour. However, the authors found statistically significant positive associations for heavy use, when considering life-long cumulative call duration of more than 896 hours (odds ratio, OR=2.89; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.41 to 5.93 for glioma and OR=2.57; 95% CI 1.02 to 6.44 for meningioma), and when considering more than 18,360 number of calls for glioma (OR=2.10; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.31). The authors conclude that these results support other findings concerning a possible association between heavy mobile phone use and brain tumours.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

The INTERPHONE project, which is coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), is a multi-national series of case-control studies (from 13 different countries including Australia) testing whether using mobile phones is associated with an increased risk of various cancers in the head and neck. The INTERPHONE studies were conducted using the same methods to enable the data to be pooled for analysis.

A pooled analysis of the INTERPHONE studies for malignant brain tumours (glioma and meningioma) showed no overall association (INTERPHONE Study Group, 2010 (PDF 187kb). There were suggestions of an association (most pronounced for glioma) in the group representing individuals with the highest cumulative call time. The authors note that limitations of the methodology prevent conclusions of causality being drawn from these observations.

In May 2011 IARC assessed the possible carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Based on positive associations found in INTERPHONE and some other epidemiological studies between glioma and acoustic neuroma and exposure to RF-EMF from wireless phones (mobile and cordless phones) IARC has classified RF EMF as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (also known as Group 2B carcinogen) (see June 2011 report). The classification by IARC does not provide estimates of what risk of cancer might by posed by any given level of exposure to RF fields. An assessment of this and other possible health effects is currently being conducted by the World Health Organization.

Authored By:

This review describes the epidemiological evidence on glioma including the incidence of the disease and possible risk factors. Glioblastoma, the most common type of glioma has an age-adjusted incidence rate in Australia of 3.4 annual cases per 100,000 people. Exposure to high levels of ionising radiation has been shown to increase the risk of glioma. The authors mention that the potential influence of mobile phone use has also been examined with inconclusive results.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

Authored By:

This is a review of epidemiological studies investigating the use of mobile phones and brain cancer risk in children. The authors mention that only limited data exists on children from only one multi-centre case-control study and some ecological studies investigating trends in brain tumour incidence rates. The authors conclude that despite a steep increase in mobile phone use among children and adolescents during the last decade, overall the available findings do not suggest an increased brain tumour risk in children using mobile phones.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

Authored By:

This is a systematic review that includes meta-analyses of in vitro, in vivo and human provocation studies investigating mobile phone use and semen quality. The systemic review showed that results of most of the human studies and in vitro laboratory studies indicated mobile phone RF exposure had negative effects on the various semen parameters studied. However, meta-analysis indicated that mobile phone use had no adverse effects on semen parameters in human studies. In the in vitro studies, meta-analysis indicated that exposure to mobile phone RF fields affected sperm motility and viability. In the in vivo studies, RF exposure affected sperm concentration and motility. The authors conclude that the evidence from current studies suggests potential harmful effects of mobile phone use on semen parameters.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

Authored By:

This cross-sectional study investigated whether using a mobile phone is associated with biochemical changes to the saliva produced by the parotid glands. In the study saliva samples were taken from 62 individuals who use a mobile phone. A comparison of biochemical changes was made between the saliva from the gland on the side where the phone is normally used (ipsilateral) to the saliva from the opposite parotid gland (contralateral) of each individual. There were no statistically significant differences in biochemical parameters between the saliva samples taken from the ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands. Using a phone for more than 3 hours per month or for more than 10 years did not have an effect. The authors conclude that using a mobile phone does not affect the saliva produced by the parotid gland.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

Authored By:

This is a report by a Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel reviewing the scientific evidence related to Canada’s safety code (PDF 670kb) on human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields. The Expert Panel concludes that the current balance of evidence does not indicate negative health effects from exposure to RF fields below the limits recommended in the safety code. However, the Expert Panel notes that research on many of the health effects is ongoing and it is possible that the findings of future studies may alter this balance of evidence. The Expert Panel recommends that health authorities should continue to monitor the literature for emerging evidence and particularly pursue scientific research aimed at cancer and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

A review of Safety Code 6 (2013): Health Canada's safety limits for exposure to radiofrequency fields

Published In:

ARPANSA published the RF exposure Standard, Radiation Protection Standard for Maximum Exposure Levels to Radiofrequency Fields – 3 kHz to 300 GHz in 2002. Since the publication of the Standard, research in the area of RF and health has grown rapidly and several major research programs and reviews have been undertaken internationally.

ARPANSA established an independent Expert Panel with the task of making an assessment of the scientific literature published since the Standard was prepared. The ARPANSA Radiofrequency Expert Panel on Review of Radiofrequency Health Effects Research – Scientific Literature 2000–2012 was published on 14 March 2014. The Expert Panel concluded that the science behind the ARPANSA RF Standard remains sound and that the exposure limits in the Standard continue to provide a high degree of protection against the known health effects of RF electromagnetic fields.

ARPANSA will review and update the Standard to take account of increased knowledge and to maintain alignment with revised international guidance.

Authored By:

This cross-sectional survey investigated whether mobile phone use is associated with subjective symptoms. In the study 1800 questionnaires were distributed in urban areas of Poland asking individuals information on their mobile phone use and any related subjective symptoms. Subjective symptoms (such as headaches, fatigue and warmth around the ear) were reported more often in people who used a mobile phone more frequently and longer compared with other users. The authors conclude that according to their results mobile phone users may experience subjective symptoms, the intensity of which depends on the intensity of use.

Link to PubMed abstract

Published In:

Authored By:

This cross-sectional study compared self-reported subjective symptoms between people identifying themselves as electromagnetic hypersensitive (EHS) and non-EHS individuals. In the study a random sample of 5789 adults that were registered as having attended a doctor for any medical condition completed a self-administered questionnaire on their EHS status. There were 202 patients (3%) that identified themselves as EHS. Participants identifying themselves as EHS had a higher prevalence of symptoms and medication prescriptions and longer symptom duration compared to non-EHS individuals. The authors conclude that self-identified EHS patients experience poorer health and more severe subjective symptoms.

PubMed link

Published In:

Authored By:

This cohort study investigated whether exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation from broadcast (radio and TV) transmitters is associated with childhood cancer. In the study all children aged under 16 years living in Switzerland on December 5, 2000 were followed till December 31, 2008 for the incidence of cancer. Exposure to RF was calculated based on the distance of the children’s residential address from broadcast transmitters and the transmitter characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations with leukaemia, brain tumour or all cancers combined. The authors conclude that this large cohort study did not show an association between RF exposure from broadcast transmitters and childhood cancer.

PubMed link

Published In:

The majority of previous epidemiological studies investigating cancer risk in children living near broadcast transmitters have been ecological or cross-sectional in design with many methodological limitations. For example, previous studies used distance between the home and the broadcast tower as a proxy for the RF exposure; no attempts were made by previous studies to estimate the exposure through measurements or calculations. The study by Hauri et al uses a cohort design and improves the assessment of exposure by performing calculations.

Authored By:

This in vivo study investigated whether exposure to RF from mobile phones caused oxidative stress in growing rats from pregnancy to 6 weeks of age. In the study rats were exposed to RF at 900MHz, 1800MHz (average specific absorption rate of 0.15 W/kg) or sham for 60 min/day during pregnancy and neonatal development. There were reduced antioxidant concentrations in the RF exposed rats compared to the non-exposed rats. The authors conclude that RF exposure from mobile phones could be considered as a cause of oxidative damage in growing rats.

PubMed link

Published In: